- Appendix A: Agency resource statement 2013–14
- Appendix B: Staffing profile
- Appendix C: Freedom of information
- Appendix D: Advertising and market research
- Appendix E: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance
- Appendix G: Committees
- Appendix H: External involvement
- Appendix I: Judge activities
- Appendix J: Court locations
- Appendix K: Contact details
Appendix A: Agency resource statement 2013–14
Table A.1: Agency Resource Statement, 2013–14
|
Actual Available appropriation
|
Payments made
|
Balance remaining
|
---|---|---|---|
Ordinary Annual Services1 |
|
|
|
Departmental appropriation2 |
191,9893 |
169,975 |
22,0144 |
Total |
191,989 |
169,975 |
22,014 |
Administered expenses |
|
|
|
Outcome 15 |
874 |
189 |
6856 |
Total |
874 |
189 |
685 |
Total ordinary annual services |
192,863 |
170,164 |
22,699 |
Special Accounts7 |
|
|
|
Opening balance |
– |
– |
– |
Appropriation receipts |
– |
– |
– |
Total special accounts |
– |
– |
– |
Total net resourcing for agency |
192,863 |
170,164 |
22,699 |
1 Appropriation Act (No.1) 2013–14 and Appropriation Act (No.3) 2013–14. This also includes Prior Year Departmental appropriation and section 31 relevant agency receipts.
2 Includes an amount of $8.358m in 2013–14 for the Departmental Capital Budget. For accounting purposes this amount has been designated as 'contributions by owners'.
3 Includes $181.778m in Appropriation (Appropriation Bill No. 1 & 3) and $3.271m in Section 31 Receipts per Note 25 Table A of the Financial Statements, and $6.940m in Cash (Cash and Cash equivalents at the beginning of the reporting period) per Cash Flow Statement.
4 Unspent Departmental Annual Appropriation per Note 25 Table C of the Financial Statements.
5 Administered Appropriation per Note 25 Table A of the Financial Statements.
6 Administered Appropriation reduced per Note 25E of the Financial Statements in accordance with Section 11 of Appropriation Act No.1 2013–14.
7 Does not include 'Special Public Money' held in Other Trust Monies Account (OTM).
Table A.2: Expenses and Resources for Outcome 1
Outcome 1: Provide access to justice for litigants in family and federal law matters within the jurisdiction of the courts through the provision of judicial and support services. |
Budget1
|
Actual Expenses
|
Variation
|
---|---|---|---|
Program 1.1: Family Court and Federal Circuit Court |
|||
Administered expenses |
|
|
|
Ordinary Annual Services (Appropriation Bill No. 1 & No. 3) |
874 |
1892 |
685 |
Expenses not requiring appropriation in the Budget year |
300 |
9153 |
-615 |
Departmental expenses |
|
|
|
Departmental Appropriation (Appropriation Bill No. 1 & No. 3)4 |
154,383 |
155,213 |
-830 |
Expenses not requiring appropriation in the Budget year5 |
49,161 |
50,167 |
-1,006 |
Total expenses for Outcome 1 |
204,718 |
206,484 |
-1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
2012–13 |
2013–14 |
|
Average Staffing Level (number) |
782 |
786 |
|
1 Full year budget, including any subsequent adjustment made to the 2013–14 Budget per 2013–14 Estimated Actual expenses in Table 2.1 of the 2014–15 Attorney General's Portfolio Budget Statements page 317.
2 Administered Expenses (Services Rendered) Per Note 18A of the Financial Statements.
3 Includes write down and impairment of assets, and refunds of fees per Note 18B and 18C of the Financial Statements.
4 Departmental Appropriation combines 'Ordinary annual services (Appropriation Bill No.1 and No.3) and 'Revenue from independent sources (s31)'.
5 Includes depreciation and amortisation, liabilities assumed by related entities for the Judges Pension Scheme (Family Court of Australia), Resources received free of charge, Judges Pension Scheme (Invalidity) (Federal Circuit Court of Australia).
Appendix B: Staffing profile
The Courts and Tribunals Legislation Amendment (Administration) Act 2012 came into effect on 1 July 2013 formalising merged administrative arrangements that had been in place for some years. The Act also formalises the arrangements for there to be a single Chief Executive Officer for both the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court.
As at 30 June 2014, the agency had a total workforce of 767 employees that either supports a specific court eg direct judicial support to a Family Court justice or a Federal Circuit Court judge, or provides shared services eg registrars, family consultants, registry services and corporate services.
Of the agency's 767 employees:
- 200 (26.08 per cent) were male and 567 (73.92 per cent) were female, and
- 628 (81.88 per cent) were ongoing employees and 139 (18.12 per cent) were non-ongoing employees.
The following tables show staff statistics by location, gender, full-time and part-time status, and ongoing and non-ongoing.
Table B.1: Staff by location
Level |
ACT |
NSO |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APS 1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
APS 2 |
2 |
2 |
19 |
|
13 |
7 |
|
17 |
|
60 |
APS 3 |
6 |
6 |
73 |
4 |
35 |
13 |
7 |
39 |
|
183 |
APS 4 |
5 |
11 |
55 |
|
32 |
13 |
4 |
31 |
1 |
152 |
APS 5 |
3 |
23 |
41 |
2 |
23 |
9 |
5 |
31 |
1 |
138 |
APS 6 |
2 |
25 |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
4 |
|
41 |
EL 1 |
3 |
34 |
33 |
|
17 |
7 |
4 |
18 |
|
116 |
EL 2 |
1 |
15 |
22 |
|
12 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
|
67 |
SES 1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
6 |
SES 2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total |
22 |
121 |
251 |
6 |
135 |
55 |
22 |
153 |
2 |
767 |
Legend
SES – Senior Executive Officer
NSO – National Support Office
Table B.2: Staff by gender
Level |
Gender |
ACT |
NSO |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APS 1 |
Male |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
APS 2 |
Female |
|
2 |
15 |
|
9 |
6 |
|
11 |
|
43 |
Male |
2 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
1 |
|
6 |
|
17 |
|
APS 3 |
Female |
4 |
4 |
53 |
3 |
26 |
7 |
6 |
30 |
|
133 |
Male |
2 |
2 |
20 |
1 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
9 |
|
50 |
|
APS 4 |
Female |
4 |
9 |
46 |
|
24 |
10 |
3 |
27 |
|
123 |
Male |
1 |
2 |
9 |
|
8 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
29 |
|
APS 5 |
Female |
3 |
13 |
35 |
2 |
22 |
8 |
4 |
27 |
1 |
115 |
Male |
|
10 |
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
23 |
|
APS 6 |
Female |
2 |
15 |
5 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
4 |
|
30 |
Male |
|
10 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
EL 1 |
Female |
3 |
8 |
29 |
|
15 |
5 |
4 |
13 |
|
77 |
Male |
|
26 |
4 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
5 |
|
39 |
|
EL 2 |
Female |
1 |
5 |
15 |
|
7 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
|
42 |
Male |
|
10 |
7 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
25 |
|
SES 1 |
Female |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
Male |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
SES 2 |
Female |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Male |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Total |
|
22 |
121 |
251 |
6 |
135 |
55 |
22 |
153 |
2 |
767 |
Table B.3: Staff by attendance status
Level |
Attendance |
ACT |
NSO |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APS 1 |
Part Time |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
APS 2 |
Full Time |
2 |
2 |
11 |
|
12 |
3 |
|
12 |
|
42 |
Part Time |
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
4 |
|
5 |
|
18 |
|
APS 3 |
Full Time |
5 |
6 |
49 |
4 |
29 |
12 |
6 |
27 |
|
138 |
Part Time |
1 |
|
24 |
|
6 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
|
45 |
|
APS 4 |
Full Time |
5 |
9 |
47 |
|
27 |
10 |
3 |
26 |
1 |
128 |
Part Time |
|
2 |
8 |
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
24 |
|
APS 5 |
Full Time |
3 |
19 |
35 |
2 |
22 |
9 |
5 |
28 |
1 |
124 |
Part Time |
|
4 |
6 |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
14 |
|
APS 6 |
Full Time |
2 |
22 |
5 |
|
1 |
2 |
|
4 |
|
36 |
Part Time |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
EL 1 |
Full Time |
2 |
30 |
23 |
|
12 |
5 |
2 |
15 |
|
89 |
Part Time |
1 |
4 |
10 |
|
5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
27 |
|
EL 2 |
Full Time |
1 |
15 |
16 |
|
9 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
|
54 |
Part Time |
|
|
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
13 |
|
SES 1 |
Full Time |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
6 |
SES 2 |
Full Time |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total |
|
22 |
121 |
251 |
6 |
135 |
55 |
22 |
153 |
2 |
767 |
Table B.4: Ongoing staff by location and classification
Level |
ACT |
NSO |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APS 1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
APS 2 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
|
7 |
4 |
|
15 |
|
40 |
APS 3 |
4 |
6 |
57 |
1 |
31 |
13 |
5 |
33 |
|
150 |
APS 4 |
3 |
11 |
35 |
|
21 |
10 |
2 |
18 |
|
100 |
APS 5 |
2 |
22 |
37 |
2 |
22 |
9 |
5 |
24 |
1 |
124 |
APS 6 |
2 |
25 |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
40 |
EL 1 |
3 |
31 |
29 |
|
11 |
6 |
4 |
17 |
|
101 |
EL 2 |
1 |
15 |
20 |
|
10 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
|
63 |
SES 1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
6 |
SES 2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total |
16 |
117 |
197 |
3 |
105 |
48 |
18 |
123 |
1 |
628 |
Table B.5: Non-ongoing staff by location and classification
Level |
ACT |
NSO |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APS 2 |
1 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
3 |
|
2 |
|
20 |
APS 3 |
2 |
|
16 |
3 |
4 |
|
2 |
6 |
|
33 |
APS 4 |
2 |
|
20 |
|
11 |
3 |
2 |
13 |
1 |
52 |
APS 5 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
7 |
|
14 |
APS 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
EL 1 |
|
3 |
4 |
|
6 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
15 |
EL 2 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Total |
6 |
4 |
54 |
3 |
30 |
7 |
4 |
30 |
1 |
139 |
Judicial Officers
At 30 June 2014, there were 65 judges, including the Chief Judge, 24 female and 41 male.
Table B.6: Number of Judges, at 30 June 2014
Location |
Judges |
---|---|
Australian Capital Territory |
3 |
New South Wales |
1 Chief Judge
|
Northern Territory |
1 |
Queensland |
13 |
South Australia |
6 |
Tasmania |
2 |
Victoria |
16 |
Western Australia |
1 |
Total |
65 |
Workforce turnover
During 2013–14, 88 employees left the agency (47 were non-ongoing, 41 were ongoing employees), being an annual turnover rate of 11.5 per cent against total employee numbers (767) at 30 June 2014.
Table B.7: Workforce turnover
Employment type |
Reason |
Total |
---|---|---|
Non-ongoing employees
|
Dismissed |
5 |
Resignation |
39 |
|
Retirement age over 65 |
3 |
|
Total non-ongoing employees |
|
47 |
Ongoing Employees
|
Dismissed |
1 |
ill health/invalidity |
2 |
|
Inter department transfer |
7 |
|
Redundancy |
4 |
|
Resignation |
21 |
|
Retirement under 60 |
3 |
|
Retirement age 65–65 |
2 |
|
Retirement age over 65 |
1 |
|
Total ongoing employees |
|
41 |
Total |
|
88 |
Note: The above figures do not include non-ongoing employees whose actual period of engagement reached their non-ongoing contract date of expiry.
Agreement making
Enterprise Agreement
The Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and Family Court of Australia Enterprise Agreement 2011–2014 continued to operate during 2013–14. The Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2014, however, under present arrangements it will continue to operate after that date until replaced or formally terminated.
At 30 June 2014, 735* Family Court and Federal Circuit Court employees were covered by the Enterprise Agreement.
Table B.8: Family Court and Federal Circuit Court employees covered by the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and Family Court of Australia Enterprise Agreement 2011–2014
Level |
Female |
Male |
Total |
---|---|---|---|
APS 1 |
|
1 |
1 |
APS 2 |
42 |
17 |
59 |
APS 3 |
133 |
50 |
183 |
APS 4 |
123 |
29 |
152 |
APS 5 |
114 |
23 |
137 |
APS 6 |
29 |
11 |
40 |
EL 1 |
75 |
33 |
108 |
EL 2 |
39 |
16 |
55 |
Total |
555 |
180 |
735 |
* Excludes casual employees.
Other agreements
Table B.9: Employees covered by other agreements
|
Australian Workplace Agreements |
Individual Flexibility Arrangements |
Common law contracts |
Determination 24 arrangements |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
APS 1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
APS 2 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
APS 3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
APS 4 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
APS 5 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
APS 6 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
EL 1 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
18 |
EL 2 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
7 |
7 |
8 |
14 |
22 |
SES 1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
SES 2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
11 |
16 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
12 |
15 |
23 |
30 |
53 |
Table B.10: AWA minimum salary ranges by classification
Classification |
Salary Range ($) |
---|---|
APS 2 |
59,311–59,311 |
APS 3 |
N/A |
APS 4 |
N/A |
APS 5 |
84,754–84,754 |
APS 6 |
82,194–82,194 |
EL 1 |
102,137–130,000 |
EL 2 |
130,087–188,665 |
SES 1 |
175,495–199,092 |
SES 2 |
209,650–215,237 |
Table B.11: Classification structure and pay rates in accordance with the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and Family Court of Australia Enterprise Agreement 2011–2014
APS Classification |
Salary rates at 1 July 2012 |
Salary rates at 1 July 2013 |
---|---|---|
APS 1 |
$42,779 |
$44,063 |
$43,937 |
$45,256 |
|
$45,745 |
$47,118 |
|
APS 2 |
$46,841 |
$48,247 |
$49,395 |
$50,877 |
|
$51,945 |
$53,504 |
|
APS 3 |
$54,740 |
$56,383 |
$56,129 |
$57,813 |
|
$57,583 |
$59,310 |
|
APS 4 |
$61,356 |
$63,197 |
$62,950 |
$64,839 |
|
$64,562 |
$66,499 |
|
APS 5 |
$66,325 |
$68,315 |
$68,404 |
$70,457 |
|
$70,330 |
$72,440 |
|
APS 6 |
$72,036 |
$74,198 |
$75,867 |
$78,144 |
|
$82,285 |
$84,754 |
|
EL 1 |
$91,831 |
$94,586 |
$95,497 |
$98,362 |
|
$99,161 |
$102,136 |
|
EL 2 |
$108,424 |
$111,677 |
$111,736 |
$115,089 |
|
$120,081 |
$123,684 |
|
$121,079 |
$125,639 |
|
$124,095 |
$127,818 |
|
$127,264 |
$131,082 |
Appendix C: Freedom of information
The Freedom of Information Act 1982 does not apply to any request for access to documents of the Court unless the document relates to matters of an administrative nature. While there is no definition within this Act or the Privacy Act of the term 'matters of an administrative nature' the High Court decision in Kline v Official Secretary to the Governor-General and Another [2013] FCA 52 in their joint judgment considering this term pointed out:
[47] ..the only documents which courts and specified tribunals, authorities and bodies are obliged to open to increase public scrutiny are those documents relating to the management and administration of registry and office resources.'
There were four Freedom of Information application requests made to the Court for the period 1 July to 30 June 2014.
Agencies subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 are required to publish information to the public as part of the Information Publication Scheme. This requirement, in Part II of the Freedom of Information Act, has replaced the former requirement to publish a Section 8 Statement in an annual report. An agency plan showing what information is published in accordance with the Information Publication Scheme requirements is accessible from agency websites.
The Freedom of Information and the Information Publication Scheme agency plan for the Federal Circuit Court can be found on the Federal Circuit Court website at: www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au
Access to information outside the Freedom of Information Act
Rule 2.08 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 provides that a search of the Court's records may be undertaken by: the Attorney-General (in family law proceedings), a party, a lawyer for a party, a child representative (in family law proceedings) or a person granted leave by the Court or a registrar. Leave may be granted if a proper interest is shown and may be subject to conditions. In relation to access to documents in general federal law proceedings, the Court applies the same rule as that prescribed by the Federal Court. This Rule identifies certain categories of court documents as being available for inspection without leave.
There are other legislative provisions which limit publication in various proceedings. For example; s121 Family Law Act 1975, s110X Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 and s91X of the Migration Act 1958. In addition section 6A of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 gives the Court general power to suppress/prohibit publication of evidence in respect of general federal law provisions (Part XIA of the Family Law Act 1975 deals with suppression and non-publication orders in proceedings under that Act).
Enquiries concerning access to documents or freedom of information matters generally should be directed to:
Chief Executive Officer
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
GPO Box 9991
Canberra ACT 2601
Categories of documents
The registries of the Family Court and Federal Court maintain the following categories of documents on behalf of the Court:
- documents relating to matters heard by the Court including applications, affidavits, transcripts, orders and copies of judgments
- registers and indexes of matters coming to the Court, and
- general correspondence.
The Federal Circuit Court maintains the following categories of documents:
- general correspondence
- documents concerning the development and implementation of policy, guidelines and procedures, and
- documents concerning the Court's administrative and financial operations.
Other documents
The Court holds and makes available on request a range of documents including brochures, fact sheets and general information leaflets. These are available on the Court's website at www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au and on the Family Law Courts website at www.familylawcourts.gov.au.
Privacy
The Court holds personal information for two purposes, being to:
- help resolve and, if necessary, determine matters before the Court (the judicial purpose), and/or
- assist in administration (the administrative purpose).
Information used for judicial purposes is held in case files and the case management computer system (Casetrack). This information is exempt from the Privacy Act 1988 and Freedom of Information Act 1982. Other statutory provisions and non-publication powers of the Court, designed to protect parties and their children, are applicable to this information.
Information used for administrative purposes is collected as part of the day-to-day running of the Court. This includes information about:
- employees of the Court
- suppliers of goods and services to the Court, and
- security matters.
The collection, storage and disclosure of this information is governed by the provisions of both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act.
Appendix D: Advertising and market research
Under sections 311A of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, the courts are required to disclose particulars of payments of $12,400 or more (inclusive of GST) for advertising, market research, polling organisations, direct mail and media advertising.
The Family Court and Federal Circuit Court spent a total of $34,659 during the 2013–14 financial year in advertising and market research, comprising mainly payments to media advertising organisations for recruitment notices, with $17,189 (GST inclusive) being paid to the Australian Public Service Commission for an annual subscription to APS Jobs.
During 2013–14, the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court did not conduct any market research or advertising campaigns.
Appendix E: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance
Key achievements |
---|
|
The following information is provided in accordance with Section 516A of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Court activities and ecologically sustainable development
As noted in its Environmental Policy, the Court:
'...recognises the importance of implementing sound environmental practices in all court functions...'
This overarching commitment to ecologically sustainable development (ESD) was implemented in a number of ways by the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court during 2013–14 as detailed below.
Impacts on the environment
The Court impacts on the environment in a number of areas, primarily in the consumption of resources.
Table E.1 lists environmental impact/usage data where available.
Table E.1: Family Court and Federal Circuit Court environmental impact/usage data, 2011–12 to 2013–14
|
2011–12 |
2012–13 |
2013–14 |
---|---|---|---|
Energy usage privately leased only (stationary) |
* |
* |
Data not available until October 2014 |
Paper usage |
24,165 reams |
27,181 reams |
23,964 reams |
Transport vehicles (energy usage) |
5,839 GJ |
6,035 GJ |
Data not available until October 2014 |
Transport flights (estimated) |
3,452,811 kms
|
3,101,516 kms
|
3,461,665 kms
|
* As a result of the re-classification of the Commonwealth Law Courts (CLCs) as Special Purpose buildings in 2012 and the associated changes to building management**, the courts no longer report energy and water usage for the CLC buildings. Therefore previous years' energy data is not comparable and has been removed.
** Historically, energy and water for the CLCs have been apportioned between the multiple jurisdictions occupying the buildings on an estimated percentage basis because there are no separate water or energy meters for each jurisdiction. In 2012, the CLCs were reclassified by the Department of Finance and Deregulation (DoFD) as Special Purpose Properties with DoFD responsible for the management of approximately 90% of the buildings. From that time, energy and water data has not been made available to the Court and is reported by DoFD.
Measures to minimise the Court's environmental impact
Environmental Management System
The Court's Environmental Management System (EMS) has many of the key elements in place including:
- an environmental policy outlining the Court's broad commitment to environmental management
- an environmental risk register identifying significant environmental aspects and impacts for the Court and treatment strategies to mitigate them
- an environmental legal register to identify any relevant environmental legal requirements for the Court (this register also includes other requirements such as applicable Australian Government policy requirements)
- an EMS manual outlining procedures for each element of the EMS, as well as summary information on each element, and
- a range of forms to accompany the EMS elements as required.
Other measures
During 2013–14, the Court worked within its EMS to minimise the environmental impact through a number of specific measures, either new or continuing, including:
Energy
- annual stationary energy use has continued to reduce, with a further reduction in 2012–13 as noted in E.1. Electricity contracts continued to be reviewed to ensure value for money. Energy supply contracts negotiated in recent years resulted in estimated savings of $45,000 during 2013–14, and
- ongoing staff education to reduce energy use where possible, such as shutting down computers and switching off lights and other electrical equipment when not in use.
Information technology
- In addition to the desktop auto shutdown implemented in 2012, staff members continued to be encouraged to shut down their desktops at the end of the day prior to the auto shutdown start time to maximise energy savings
- e-waste is recycled or reused where possible, including auctioning redundant but still operational equipment
- ensuring ICT Sustainability Plan 2010–15 equipment standards are met when procuring new equipment, and
- ensuring fully recyclable packaging where possible.
Paper
- a reduction in paper usage of over 3000 reams was made from 2013–14 compared to 2012–13, taking usage to below 2011–12 levels.
- most facsimile machines are set to email to reduce printing costs
- affidavits over 100 pages are no longer printed
- one-sided paper is reused for notepaper in some registries
- clients are encouraged to use the online Commonwealth Courts Portal
- records are stored electronically where possible, and
- staff are encouraged to send emails rather than sending letters, where possible.
- secure paper (confidential etc) continued to be shredded and recycled for all court locations
- non-secure paper recycling is available at 15 sites, and
- most printers are set to default to print double sided and monochrome.
Waste/cleaning
- work commenced on national cleaning tenders for both the CLCs and many of the privately leased registries, with the new contracts scheduled to commence in 2014–15. The Statement of Requirements for both of the cleaning tenders include the provision for recycling.
- sites with waste recycling (commingled recycling) for plastics, metal, cardboard etc. is available at six sites
- printer toner cartridges are now recycled at the majority of sites
- recycling facilities for staffs' personal mobiles are permanently available at 11 sites
- electronic media (CDs, work mobiles etc.) continue to be securely shredded and components recycled where possible
- all sites recycle secure paper waste, and non secure paper waste is recycled at 15 sites, and
- light globes are recycled at all sites.
Corporate culture/communication
- The Court's Environmental Champions Network continues to offer the opportunity for staff to provide their input to environmental matters for the Court. The volunteer membership has increased from five members in 2010 to 19 members representing 13 sites nationally in 2013–14. Projects in 2013–14 included:
- Earth Hour
- a national 'Transport Challenge', where staff earned points for walking, riding etc. or using public transport to go to and from work over a two week period
- Christmas electronic equipment shutdown drive
- establishment of the ECN internal online national 'community' for interactive communication between members
- an environmental management intranet page provides information on environmental issues for the courts
- regular articles about the Court's environmental status are included in the internal e-newsletter the Courts Exchange
- a Court specific 'envirosmart' logo is used as branding when promoting environmental initiatives, and
- the Court continues to be represented as a member on the (federal) Government Agency Environmental Network; an interagency network facilitating the sharing of best practice environmental information. Its membership includes approximately 30 agencies.
Property
Fit outs and refurbishments continue to be conducted in an environmentally responsible manner by:
- recycling demolished materials where possible
- maximising reuse of existing furniture and fittings
- engaging consultants with experience in sustainable development where possible
- maximising use of environmentally friendly products such as recycled content in furniture and fittings, low volatile organic compounds paint and adhesives, and energy efficient appliances, lighting and air conditioning, and
- installing water efficient appliances.
Travel
Whilst some travel is unavoidable due to the nature of the Court, staff are encouraged to consider alternatives if possible, including utilising improved videoconferencing facilities.
Review and improvement strategies
As noted in the Environmental Policy under the EMS, the Court is committed to 'continual improvement in environmental performance'.
Reviews of environmental impacts and improvement strategies are periodically conducted via a number of means. In 2013–2014 the Court:
- reviewed the environmental risk register (significant environmental aspects and impacts), and
- collected and reported relevant energy use and emission data under the Energy Efficiency in Government Operations Policy.
Additional ecologically sustainable development implications
In 2013–14, the Court did not administer any legislation with ESD implications nor did it have outcomes specified in an Appropriations Act with ESD implications.
Appendix F: Fraud control certification
In accordance with guideline 5.8 of the Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines 2011, issued by the Minister for Justice and Customs, pursuant to Regulation 19 of the Financial Management and Accountability Regulations 1997, I hereby certify that I am satisfied that:
The Family Court and Federal Circuit Court of Australia Agency has prepared fraud assessments and has in place a fraud control plan that complies with the Guidelines.
Appropriate fraud prevention, detection, investigation and reporting procedures and process are in place.
Annual fraud data has been collected and reported that complies with the Guidelines.
[Signed in hard copy]
Richard Foster, PSM
Chief Executive Officer
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
15 August 2013
Appendix G: Committees
Committees
Table G.1 provides details of the membership and functions of the Federal Circuit Court committees (alphabetical order), at 30 June 2014.
Table G.1: Federal Circuit Court Committees 30 June 2014
Title |
Members |
Terms of Reference |
---|---|---|
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Access to Justice Committee |
|
How the Federal Circuit Court can improve access to justice in this Court for Indigenous litigants. |
Audit and Risk Committee |
Observers
|
Monitor and where necessary recommend improvements to:
|
Business Systems and Information Technology Committee |
|
To provide a forum for the Federal Circuit Court judiciary to review the operations of the Court with respect to business systems and information technology in order to ensure the Court operates as efficiently as is reasonably possible whilst providing a high level of judicial services to litigants. |
Case Management Judges Committee |
Judge Baumann (National Coordinator of Case Management)
|
To assist the Chief Judge and the National Coordinator of Case Management in the case management of the Court and to enhance the adoption of consistent case management practices throughout the Court. |
Legal Committee |
|
To consider and refer recommendations to the Chief Judge on possible rule amendments and wider legal issues concerning the Court's jurisdiction. |
Policy Advisory Committee |
|
To provide advice to the Chief Judge in relation to the Court's overall strategies and policies for the delivery of court services. During the year the committee was augmented by the inclusion of the chairs of the standing committees – Court Excellence, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Access to Justice, Business Systems and Information Technology Committee. |
Research Ethics Subcommittee |
|
To consider, monitor and overview all research and evaluation proposals for approval and disseminate research papers/results as necessary. |
Joint Committees
Table G.2 provides details of the membership and functions of the joint committees (alphabetical order) of the Federal Circuit Court at 30 June 2014.
Table G.2: Joint committees, 30 June 2014
Committee |
Members |
Terms of reference |
---|---|---|
Access to Justice
|
|
To oversee the Court's cultural diversity plan and provide advice to the Chief Justice and Chief Executive Officer on cultural diversity issues, special needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and self-represented litigants. |
Chief Executive Officer's Management Advisory Group |
|
To provide operational and policy advice to the Chief Executive Officer regarding key areas that are likely to be affected by the integration of the administrations of the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court. |
Children's Committee |
|
To ascertain what, if any, further work needs to be undertaken with respect to the involvement of children in parenting cases and assess whether children feel their voices have been heard in proceedings that addressed their living arrangements. |
Family Violence Committee |
|
To complete the implementation of the courts' Family Violence Strategy and provide advice to the Chief Judge, Chief Justice of the Family Court and Chief Executive Officer on family violence issues. |
Courts information Committee |
|
To identify and describe the agreed statistical and management information needs of the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court at all levels. |
Information Technology |
|
To provide direction to the courts about new areas of IT development, investment and investigation by providing high level advice and making recommendations to each jurisdiction's policy advisory group about IT support needs for judicial officers within the courts. |
National Consultative Committee |
|
Consultative forum for staff about issues with a national perspective, such as industrial democracy, security, the strategic objectives of the courts, equal employment opportunities, new technology, accommodation and amenities, and personnel and staffing policies and practices. Delegates present staff views on issues that affect the management and future direction of the courts and provide feedback and briefings to the workplace nationally. |
Property Management Committee |
|
To plan and assess the current and future needs of the courts in relation to property services including contracting, refurbishment and construction activity. |
Staff Development Committee |
|
To identify, develop and/or develop national training and development initiatives, policies and programs. |
Work Health and Safety |
|
|
Appendix H: External involvement
The Chief Judge, judges and the Chief Executive Officer participate in a range of consultative and strategic forums including the following:
Family Law Council
The Family Law Council, established by the Attorney-General under section 115 of the Family Law Act 1975, confers with the Court in the course of its consideration of particular aspects of family law. The Court has judges appointed to the council and senior executives as observers at its meetings.
Australian Institute of Family Studies
The Australian Institute of Family Studies was established under section 114B of the Family Law Act and is a forum for exchange of information and research.
Family Law Forum
The Chief Justice chairs the national Family Law Forum, which consists of representatives from the Family Court, Federal Circuit Court, the Family Law Council, the Family Law Section of the Law Council of Australia, National Legal Aid, the Attorney-General's Department, the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Child Support, the Australian Institute of Family Studies, non-government organisations and community legal centres. The Family Law Forum met in November 2013.
In addition to the Family Law Forum, a number of external stakeholders contribute to court direction by contributing to or being members of various court committees, for example, as members of the Court's Magellan Committee, the Audit and Risk Committee and the Family Law Courts Advisory Group. For more information on court committees, see Appendix G.
Community relations
Local family law registry consultations and other activities
Registry engagement with local communities, community-based organisations concerned with family support and the family law system, community forums, law societies, family law pathway networks, volunteer networks, other government agencies was once again a priority in 2013–14.
Consultation is considered essential and invaluable in developing and maintaining critical relationships that assist litigants. Regular consultation provides the registries with feedback about users' experiences of registry services and the courts. This inevitably leads to service improvements and ensures that the Court is better placed to assist litigants.
Some of the highlights from the year, reported in more detail below, include:
Victoria
Melbourne and Dandenong – Child Protection and Better Outcomes for Families
Collaboration and sharing of information between the Family Court, the Federal Circuit Court and State and Territory child protection departments are essential in making good decisions about families and children. Where concerns about child abuse are raised in the context of family law proceedings it is possible for children to be involved in both the child protection system and the family law system.
In anticipation of the need for even greater co-ordinated and collaborative relationships between the federal family law jurisdictions and state child welfare authorities, an initiative of co-location of a child protection worker at the Melbourne registry of the Commonwealth Law Courts and Dandenong Federal Circuit Court was introduced.
The vision was that working together, with the dedicated focus of a specialist senior child protection practitioner, would ensure professional, sensitive and well-targeted responses to those children and young people who are at significant risk of harm.
To address the volume of family law related reports to Child Protection in the Southern Division, a senior regional child protection practitioner was co-located at the Dandenong Federal Circuit Court. This position primarily is responsible for registering and following up on all new reports made by the Dandenong Registry to Inner South area of the Southern Division of the Victorian Department. The position is also the decision maker in relation to the investigation of Child Protection cases including a thorough handover to the relevant team.
The state wide co-located position is based in Melbourne registry and is for a fixed term of two years until December 2014. The position is intended to provide a state wide liaison role and to guide the response to concerns for the safety and wellbeing of children in the context of family law proceedings at a broader policy level.
Anecdotal reports from judges, the Victorian Department and the registries state that this initiative is achieving the objective of ensuring exchange of relevant and timely information so that arrangements can be made to protect children at risk.
Dandenong – cultural diversity and the courts
- Dandenong registry hosted 15 Indonesian delegates from religious and general courts, non-government organisations, disability support agencies, the University of Indonesia and the Indonesian Human Rights Commission. This delegation was made under the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between Australia and the Supreme Court of Indonesia. The delegates learnt about community and state funded legal services provided at Dandenong and in particular, observed the operations of the Family Law Assistance Program which is a partnership with Monash University to provide free legal advice.
- Dandenong registry hosted an Access and Equity Forum to inform the wider family law community about African communities within family law. The session was sponsored by the Victorian Family Law Pathways Network. Dandenong registry was chosen because the city has significant cultural diversity and is one of the Victorian migrant settlement hubs for new and emerging African communities.
Queensland
Brisbane
- The Brisbane registry has maintained a collaborative approach with the State Magistrates Court in maximising the use of their Justice of the Peace (JP) service to the community. To assist with this process, JP presentations focus on the particular requirements for witnessing family law documents and to encourage volunteers to offer time as JP's in the registry.
- Features of 'drop box' model:
- all solicitors/law firm filing clerks directed to 'drop box' all material for filing solicitors/law firm filing clerks select method of return – mail, registry post box, pick up 48 hour turnaround is assured
- no ticket taken at counter thus not waiting in counter queue, drop box cover sheets and large envelopes supplied, secure box provided – process is self-managed without necessity of intervention by client service officers
- time created by client service officer's not having to file voluminous material on the spot can be spent filing when queue permits
- rate of requisitions is no greater than filing on the spot or filing by other methods
- The judicial services team leaders of both courts supervise and manage the respective associates, the Federal Circuit Court national group is chaired by the Principal Registrar, Adele Byrne, to discuss current policy and procedural issues relevant to chambers. Meetings are also attended by Steve Agnew, Executive Director of Operations
Townsville/Cairns
- The Registry Manager, and staff representatives, attended regular meetings with the North Queensland Domestic Violence Resource Service, the Family Law Pathways Network, the Family Relationship Centre (CentaCare), and Relationships Australia, as well as ad hoc meetings with the profession and representatives from State Government departments.
- Regular liaison with the Townsville Multi-Cultural Support Group and the Townsville Inter-cultural Centre.
- Presentations made to JPs and commissioners for declarations at the invitation of the JP branch.
- Judges of the Federal Circuit Court in Townsville and Cairns participated in moot courts for law students from James Cook University.
New South Wales
Newcastle
- Child Dispute Services officers attended monthly Family Law Pathways Network meetings and were involved in presenting at and organising various activities in the Newcastle region. Of special note was the Family Law Aboriginal Roadshow as part of National Reconciliation week activities and the Greater Newcastle Family Law Pathways network annual conference on 'Collaboration in the family law sector'.
- The judges and registry officers held quarterly meetings with members of the legal profession.
- Regular seminars were held for members of the legal profession at lunch times with judges and lawyers presenting topics.
Topics covered during 2013–14 included the following:
- Family reports
- a mud map of superannuation – issues from initial conference to hearing
- Police super
- Child support
- spouse maintenance
- introduction into trusts
- Personal Property Register/Director's Penalty Notice – implications for caveats and caveatable interests.
The registry hosted students from the University of Newcastle throughout the year as part of their family law training program. The registry hosted high school students conducting mock trials throughout the year.
Sydney
Key collaborative engagements continued in 2013–14 with the following services being delivered in the Sydney registry:
- expanded Legal Aid family law duty service
- Legal Aid NSW court ordered mediation program
- information and referral service (provided by the Sydney City Family Relationship Centre)
- Women's family law support service
- regular meetings chaired by the case management judges of the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court continued to be held with family law practitioners
- Continuing Legal Education seminars where held approximately every two months for members of the profession
- a child dispute services representative continued to attend meetings of the Greater Sydney Families in Transition Group (Pathways), and
- as part of the Federal Circuit Court's Reconciliation Action Plan, a morning tea was arranged with local Indigenous service providers in the legal and community sectors to begin the process of information sharing and improving visibility of these services.
Wollongong
- Federal Circuit Judge met with the local legal profession.
- A Child Dispute Services representative continued to attend local Pathways meetings.
South Australia/Northern Territory
Adelaide
During 2013–14 the registry has been active in developing and implementing triage practices in an effort to reduce waiting times at our filing and subpoena counters.
Other activities throughout the year included:
- continued active involvement with stakeholder and community groups, including, Pathways, Family Relationship Centres, Children's Contact Services, Family Law Practitioners', Grandparents for Grandchildren Inc, law students from the Adelaide University, University of South Australia and the South Australian Police – call centre staff training
- hosted the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse – Adelaide Hearing
- established a relationship with the South Australian Multi Agency Protection Service. This service is a partnership between multi-agencies and lead by South Australian Police, in protecting and providing services to vulnerable people within the community
- hosted a visit from Judge Kida, Registrar Ishihara, and Registrar Muramatsu from Japan and Professor Kent Anderson from the Adelaide University SA
- co-presented to University South Australia law students a seminar focused on the practical application of family law, from the judicial perspective, the role of family consultants in the process and the roles of both judge and family consultant in case management
- facilitated a hypothetical ('The voice of the child') for the South Australian Family Law Pathways annual conference. This hypothetical traced the path of a family from separation to trial, with a focus on the range of agencies involved, and examining at each stage how the voice of the child is represented
- worked with the Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department in relation to the South Australian component of the pilot project 'Improving the interface between the child protection systems and the family law system'. Adelaide registry also assisted with the Notice of Risk South Australia Pilot.
- continued quarterly meetings with representatives from the legal profession and Families SA
- coordinated and chaired the Family Law Conference in Bali in June 2014, and
- South Australian launch of the Federal Circuit Court's Reconciliation Action Plan.
Darwin
- Continued active involvement with Pathways and Family Relationships Centre Consortium Group, local Indigenous Groups.
- Quarterly meetings with representatives from the legal profession.
- Northern Territory launch of the of the Federal Circuit Court's Reconciliation Action Plan.
- Presentations to Darwin family law practitioners (Family Law Refresher programme, Law Society of NT) in relation to the role of family consultants as case assessors and relocation matters – a research perspective, with implications for the assessment and litigation processes.
Alice Springs
- The Federal Circuit Court judge met with the Alice Springs Family Pathways Network and legal practitioners.
Tasmania
Tasmania – Linking with Police and Community to address Family Violence
The Tasmania Family Violence Consultative Committee forum is convened biannually and includes members of the community sector, Department of Justice (Safe at Home), Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmania Police and senior staff of the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court. The forum is convened by the courts Senior Family Consultant, Ms Antonia Dunne, and is arranged in Hobart with video link to Launceston to ensure that the views of the northern part of the state are heard and taken into account.
Discussion points have included the analysis of work pre and post implementation of the family violence legislative amendments, police training and police responses to family violence.
General federal law
Adelaide
- Presentation to the South Australian Bar Association Bar Readers Course on Bankruptcy.
- 'Working with the Court Electronically' presentation to profession
- Attended bankruptcy user group meetings.
Brisbane
- eLodgment hands-on training sessions for law firms.
- Consultation with law firms regarding eServices initiatives of the Federal Court and Federal Circuit Court.
- District Registrar Baldwin is a member of the Law Council of Australia Insolvency Committee (Queensland Chapter). The chapter meets monthly and reports back to the Law Council of Australia on bankruptcy matters.
Melbourne
- Migration user group meetings attended by Federal Circuit Court judges, registrars, senior registry staff and a broad representation from the profession. Matters discussed concentrated on maintaining best case management practice and input was received from all interested parties as to how this is best achieved.
- Met with the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (Ombudsman) with a view to ensuring the efficient case management of the Small Claims List in Melbourne, particularly in relation to assistance from the Ombudsman for litigants in the list.
- Information sessions about upgrades to the Court's eLodgment system in preparation for the introduction of the electronic court file later in 2014. The sessions were well attended by firms.
Sydney
- New South Wales hosted general federal law user group meetings.
Perth
- Liaison with local Law Society Courts Committee.
Appendix I: Judge activities
Judge activities
Acronyms used in Appendix I
AAWJ Australian Association of Women Judges
AFCC Association of Family and Conciliation Courts
AIJA Australian Institute of Judicial Administration
CCH Commerce Clearing House
CLE Continuing Learning Education
FLPA Family Law Practitioners Association
IAWJ International Association of Women Judges
IARLJ International Association of Refugee Law Judges
QLS Queensland Law Society
QPILCH Queensland Public Interest Law Clearing House Incorporated
Judge |
Conferences, presentations, papers and other activities to external organisations |
---|---|
Chief Judge
|
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
Facilitating
|
Judge Baumann AM |
Presentations
Facilitating
|
Judge Brewster |
Professional Memberships
|
Judge Hartnett |
Conferences
Presentations
Facilitating
|
Judge Coker |
Ceremonial Sittings
Presentations
Other external activities
|
Judge Driver |
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
Facilitating
|
Judge Roberts |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Other external activities
|
Judge Phipps |
Presentations
|
Judge Brown |
Papers
|
Judge Coakes |
Conferences
Presentations
Facilitating
|
Judge Jarrett |
Professional Memberships
Facilitating
Other external activities
|
Judge Riethmuller |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Other external activities
|
Judge Lloyd-Jones |
Professional Memberships
Other external activities
|
Judge Sexton |
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
Conferences
Presentations
Facilitating
Other external activities
|
Judge Lapthorn |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
Facilitating
|
Judge Henderson |
Ceremonial Sittings
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
Other external activities
|
Judge Hughes |
Other external activities
|
Judge Burchardt |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Conferences
Other external activities
|
Judge O'Sullivan |
Conferences
|
Judge Halligan |
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
|
Judge Lucev |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Conferences
Papers
|
Judge Cameron |
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
Conferences
Facilitating
|
Judge Altobelli |
Professional Memberships
Presentations/Papers
Other external activities
|
Judge Burnett |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
Facilitating
Other external activities
|
Judge Coates |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Conferences
Other external activities
|
Judge Kelly |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Conferences
|
Judge Terry |
Presentations
|
Judge Simpson |
Professional Memberships
Ceremonial Sittings
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
|
Judge Howard |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
|
Judge Purdon-Sully |
Ceremonial Sittings
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
Other external activities
|
Judge Cassidy |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Bender |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Other external activities
|
Judge Demack |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
Other external activities
|
Judge Walker |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge McGuire |
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Dunkley |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Baker |
Professional Memberships
Presentations
Other external activities
|
Judge Willis |
Ceremonial Sittings
Professional Memberships
Facilitating
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
Papers
Other external activities
|
Judge Whelan |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Harman |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations/Papers
Other external activities
|
Judge L. Turner |
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Myers |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Presentations
|
Judge Manousaridis |
Professional Memberships
Conferences
Other external activities
|
Judge Stewart |
Presentations
|
Appendix J: Court locations
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY |
---|
CANBERRA |
NEW SOUTH WALES |
PARRAMATTA, NEWCASTLE, SYDNEY
|
NORTHERN TERRITORY |
DARWIN
|
QUEENSLAND |
BRISBANE, CAIRNS, TOWNSVI LLE
|
SOUTH AUSTRALIA |
ADELAIDE
|
TASMANIA |
HOBART, LAUNCESTON
|
WESTERN AUSTRALIA |
PERTH |
VICTORIA |
MELBOURNE
|
|
|
Family law registries |
|
---|---|
National Enquiry Centre |
|
Telephone enquiries: TTY/Voice calls International: Email: |
1300 352 000 Contact the National Relay Service on 133 677 or Speak & Listen contact 1300 555 727 +61 2 8892 8590 |
Australian Capital Territory |
|
Canberra |
Nigel Bowen Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
New South Wales |
|
Albury |
Level 1, 463 Kiewa Street, Albury NSW 2640 |
Dubbo |
Cnr Macquarie and Wingewarra Streets, Dubbo NSW 2830 |
Lismore |
Westlawn Building, Level 2, 29–31 Molesworth Street, Lismore NSW 2480 |
Newcastle |
61 Bolton Street, Newcastle NSW 2300 |
Parramatta |
Garfield Barwick Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
Sydney |
Lionel Bowen Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
Wollongong |
Level 1, 43 Burelli Street, Wollongong NSW 2500 |
Northern Territory |
|
Alice Springs |
Westpoint Building,
|
Darwin |
TCG Building, 80 Mitchell Street, Darwin NT 0800 |
Queensland |
|
Brisbane |
Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
Cairns |
Commonwealth Government Centre, Level 3 and 4
|
Rockhampton |
Virgil Power Building, Ground Floor
|
Townsville |
Level 2, Commonwealth Centre, 143 Walker Street, Townsville QLD 4810 |
South Australia |
|
Adelaide |
Roma Mitchell Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
Tasmania |
|
Hobart |
Edward Braddon Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
Launceston |
ANZ Building, Level 3, Cnr Brisbane and George Streets, Launceston TAS 7250 |
Victoria |
|
Dandenong |
53–55 Robinson Street, Dandenong VIC 3175 |
Melbourne |
Owen Dixon Commonwealth Law Courts Building
|
General federal law registries |
||
---|---|---|
All enquiries should be directed to the relevant registry, contact details follow. TTY/Voice calls – Contact the National Relay Service on 133 677 or Speak & Listen contact 1300 555 727 |
||
Australian Capital Territory |
||
Canberra |
Nigel Bowen
|
Phone: (02) 6267 0566 Fax: (02) 6267 0625 Email: actman@fedcourt.gov.au |
New South Wales |
||
Sydney |
Law Courts Building
|
Phone: (02) 9377 5600 Fax: (02) 9230 8295 Email: nswdr@fedcourt.gov.au |
Northern Territory |
||
Darwin |
Level 3 Supreme Court Building
|
Phone: (08) 8941 2333 Fax: (08) 8941 4941 Email: ntreg@fedcourt.gov.au |
Queensland |
||
Brisbane |
Level 6 Harry Gibbs
|
Phone: (07) 3248 1100 Fax: (07) 3248 1260 Email: qldreg@fedcourt.gov.au |
South Australia |
||
Adelaide |
Level 5 Roma Mitchell
|
Phone: (08) 8219 1000 Fax: (08) 8219 1001 Email: sareg@fedcourt.gov.au |
Tasmania |
||
Hobart |
Edward Braddon
|
Phone: (03) 6232 1615 Fax: (03) 6232 1601 Email: tasreg@fedcourt.gov.au |
Victoria |
||
Melbourne |
Owen Dixon
|
Phone: (03) 8600 3333 Fax: (03) 8600 3351 Email: vicreg@fedcourt.gov.au |
Western Australia |
||
Perth |
Peter Durack
|
Phone: (08) 9268 7100 Fax: (08) 9221 3261 Email: waregistry@fedcourt.gov.au |
Appendix K: Contact details
Chambers of the Chief Judge
Chief Judge John Pascoe AO CVO
GPO Box 9991
Sydney NSW 2000
Phone: (02) 9234 0002
Fax: (02) 9234 0052
Office of the Chief Executive Officer
Mr Richard Foster PSM
GPO Box 9991
Canberra ACT 2601
Phone: (02) 6243 8725
Fax: (02) 6243 8737
National Enquiry Centre
The National Enquiry Centre (NEC) is the entry point for all telephone and email enquiries on Family Law Court (Federal Circuit Court and Family Court) matters. The NEC provides information and procedural advice, forms and brochures, and referrals to community and support services. NEC staff cannot provide legal advice.
Opening Hours: 8.30am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday
Phone: 1300 352 000
International: +61 2 8892 8590
Postal Address: PO Box 9991, Parramatta NSW 2124
TTY/voice calls: Contact the National Relay Service on 133 677 or for Speak and Listen calls contact 1300 555 727
Email: enquiries@familylawcourts.gov.au
Website
www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au
Commonwealth Courts Portal – www.comcourts.gov.au
customer.service@federalcircuitcourt.gov.au
enquiries@familylawcourts.gov.au
Commonwealth Courts Portal – support@comcourts.gov.au
Communication enquiries – communication@familylawcourts.gov.au